Producers Warehouse Company - Revision history

Robert Bowdidge at 04:54, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T04:54:49Z

Robert Bowdidge at 04:44, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T04:44:32Z

Robert Bowdidge at 04:43, 2 July 2015

2015-07-02T04:43:25Z

Robert Bowdidge at 10:04, 13 December 2014

2014-12-13T10:04:49Z

Robert Bowdidge at 08:29, 13 December 2014

2014-12-13T08:29:35Z

Robert Bowdidge: Add highlighted term

2014-12-13T08:26:24Z

Add highlighted term

Robert Bowdidge at 04:54, 12 August 2013

2013-08-12T04:54:14Z

Robert Bowdidge at 04:50, 12 August 2013

2013-08-12T04:50:24Z

Robert Bowdidge: Remove summary header

2013-07-30T14:49:29Z

Remove summary header

Robert Bowdidge: Convert Infobox to Infobox_Industry

2013-07-14T18:19:08Z

Convert Infobox to Infobox_Industry

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 '''Producers Warehouse Company''' was a public warehouse associated with [[California Cooperative Canneries]].  The company was building a plant in San Jose in 1918 between Jackson, Taylor, 9th, and 10th streets.  [[Vernon Campbell]] was the general manager in 1918.
-The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.  In the 1922 Senate hearing over the consent decree, [[Vernon Campbell]]'s petition mentioned that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] had initially been incorporated as Producers Warehouse, but the name had been changed<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=TVqWSyl8QS0C&lpg=PA703&ots=Uoc9ZpSbhV&dq=packers%20decree&pg=PA29#v=onepage&q=packers%20decree&f=false Packer's Consent Decree: Hearings Before a Subcommittee...], United States Senate, 1922.</ref>.
+The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.
 A Mercury News article was happy about the initial lawsuit, claiming that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] was actually a "blind" for Armour - they wouldn't have been able to buy fruit under their actual name, so they needed the side company to do it.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 '''Producers Warehouse Company''' was a public warehouse associated with [[California Cooperative Canneries]].  The company was building a plant in San Jose in 1918 between Jackson, Taylor, 9th, and 10th streets.  [[Vernon Campbell]] was the general manager in 1918.
-The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.  In the 1922 Senate hearing over the consent decree, [[Vernon Campbell]]'s petition mentioned that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] had initially been incorporated as Producers Warehouse, but the name had been changed.
+The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.  In the 1922 Senate hearing over the consent decree, [[Vernon Campbell]]'s petition mentioned that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] had initially been incorporated as Producers Warehouse, but the name had been changed<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=TVqWSyl8QS0C&lpg=PA703&ots=Uoc9ZpSbhV&dq=packers%20decree&pg=PA29#v=onepage&q=packers%20decree&f=false Packer's Consent Decree: Hearings Before a Subcommittee...], United States Senate, 1922.</ref>.
 A Mercury News article was happy about the initial lawsuit, claiming that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] was actually a "blind" for Armour - they wouldn't have been able to buy fruit under their actual name, so they needed the side company to do it.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 | primary_dates = 1919-1930
 | primary_industry = public warehouse
 }}
 '''Producers Warehouse Company''' was a public warehouse associated with [[California Cooperative Canneries]].  The company was building a plant in San Jose in 1918 between Jackson, Taylor, 9th, and 10th streets.  [[Vernon Campbell]] was the general manager in 1918.
-The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.
+The company was mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.  <ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].</ref>  The case went to the Surpreme Court,  alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them<ref>(U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)</ref>.  In the 1922 Senate hearing over the consent decree, [[Vernon Campbell]]'s petition mentioned that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] had initially been incorporated as Producers Warehouse, but the name had been changed.
 A Mercury News article was happy about the initial lawsuit, claiming that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] was actually a "blind" for Armour - they wouldn't have been able to buy fruit under their actual name, so they needed the side company to do it.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Infobox_Industry
 | primary_town = San Jose
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Producers Warehouse Company'''{{Infobox_Industry
+{{Infobox_Industry
 | primary_town = San Jose
 }}
 ==Locations==
@@ Line 11: / Line 24: @@
 |-
 |}
-==Details==
+==References==
 [[Category:San Jose]]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Also known as [[California Cooperative Canneries]], mentioned in 1918 congressional testimony about the control Armour had over the raisin (and wider canning?) industry.  Producers Warehouse was primarily selling to Armour, and Armour reserved the right to buy the cannery if they tried to sell.
-[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false]
+[http://books.google.com/books?id=J5IpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA933&ots=FxLUDUAnOM&dq=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&pg=PA929#v=onepage&q=Producers%20warehouse%20company%20san%20jose&f=false List of big packing companies handling unrelated lines].
-Case went to Supreme alleging that the packer consent decree between Swift, Armour, and the US interfered with [[California Cooperative Canneries]] selling to them.  (U.S. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES 279 U.S. 553 (1929) UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE CANNERIES. No. 375. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1929. Decided May 20, 1929.)
 Mercury News article is happy about the initial lawsuit, claiming that [[California Cooperative Canneries]] was actually a "blind" for Armour - they wouldn't have been able to buy fruit under their actual name, so they needed the side company to do it.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 "Armour interests" sold to Tri-Valley Packers in late 1930's.
-Vernon Campbell general manager in 1918.
+[[Vernon Campbell]] general manager in 1918.
 See also